Is RFK, Jr. running a psyop?

Responding to email feedback, as well as Kevin Barrett's very clever question

This post is a response to email feedback from an earlier article I wrote, Is RFK Jr.'s loyalty to Israel a dealbreaker? More interestingly, though, I address a provocative article by Kevin Barrett in which he speculates whether Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is running a psyop on us.

First, my responses to email feedback from a colleague.

My interlocuter claims in his email to me that “RFK will be killed very soon.” Jeez, come on! While I agree RFK, Jr. is in danger of being assassinated (as are all politicians and celebrities), I don’t think IF it happens, it would happen this early on in the game.  Why cause an enormous predicament so soon?  I think it would be more likely after he wins the presidential election, but before he takes office. But as I write more positively below, I think RFK has created a 5D-chess safety net for himself.

I also agree that chances are extremely slim for a nomination from within the Democrat party. No matter which Democrat reptile RFK goes up against, the DNC will deny him the nomination.  (Listen to my interview RFK Jr. Is Fantastic, But... with Kevin Barrett in which I explain how the DNC Fraud lawsuit basically assures Bobby will lose the Democratic candidacy.) Only an insurrection from Kennedy Democrats (if not the public) would make his nomination possible, but then all the DNC has to do is delay, delay, delay with lawfare battles. I’m convinced the Democratic route is a dead-end strategy that provides virtually no advantages to the Kennedy camp. So why is someone so smart pursuing such a losing proposition?

A big advantage supposedly from being a Democrat candidate would be the press attention. Yet, a) the damn Dem media machine is barely covering Bobby (and when they do, it’s not positive), and b) he’s getting massive eyeballs from his numerous social media podcasts, especially the long-form interviews where he totally trounces the competition. In short, someone with Bobby’s name recognition and intellectual prowess has no sizeable advantage in this age of social media to run as a Democrat party candidate.

A big question is why his campaign is still not strongly urging voters to register as Democrats. How will RFK ever make it to first base if he doesn’t get people to officially register with the party, however temporarily?  There just are not enough existing registered Democrats to give Bobby the edge he needs to win the nomination.

I further agreed with my interlocuter’s email that an independent ticket must be formed NOW and is RFK’s only hope, but a new party will not get started without a direct commitment from him.  It makes no sense. It’s too iffy and expensive to put a ghost party in play. So back to my longstanding proposition: Bobby should be running an independent campaign NOW, and he should have strategized that route from the get-go. Anything less looks really suspect if you ask me.

Upon an inevitable DNC ouster, I contend it’s not an option for Bobby to just hop over to a third party mid-electoral season, be it the Greens or the Libertarians. He’d alienate one wing of the populace against the other. He wants to heal the divide, but the Greens are too far woke left and the Libertarians are too far anti-government right. And what other party would there be for him to go with? If he creates his own party NOW while its still early, he could take the best of both the Greens and the Libertarians and everything else in between.

Also, how rude to just bump the party candidate that was running, or bogart an independent party when he should have started his own. Net net, I think trying to hijack an existing third party so late in the game would be a failed option even if a party were all in. That play is simply too far behind the eight-ball in terms of the timing of the election and a platform needing to appeal to the broad voter spectrum.

Getting back to the assassination angle, another thing that may well protect RFK is all the love with which he’s been showering Israel.  Obviously, anyone who doesn’t bow to the Zionist vote will not get elected in this country at this time.  In regards to that, the best article yet to explain RFK’s baffling position on Israel was one Kevin Barrett wrote asking the brilliant question of whether RFK, Jr. is a Psy-opper? (Scroll down in link to that section.)

First and foremost, one has to get past taking RFK’s Israeli statements at face value. He’s obviously way too smart to make such extreme, hyperbolic remarks. As Kevin astutely pointed out:

Saying “Israel doesn’t deliberately kill children” is kind of like saying “the United States never dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki” or “Ukrainian nationalists have never deliberately killed their ethnic Russian fellow Ukrainians.” It’s such an obvious and outrageous big lie that it discredits the side it pretends to support.

Proof that Israel deliberately shoots to kill babies. They claim it’s a joke T-shirt. Yeah, right. Sounds like a Big Lie to me.

Kevin said Bobby is being ironic, and trying to humor Israelis with his audacious statements.  No way!  If you get past taking his words at face value , for someone as well-informed as RFK, the only conclusion that makes sense is that Bobby is playing 5D chess!

Here’s three ways of assessing the results of such a shrewd strategy:

1. Everyone knows the truth about Israel, that it’s a world pariah for a reason. What Bobby, a true humanitarian, has done is unleash an army of truth tellers who take RFK’s Israel statements at face value and are vociferously correcting the record. Result: a huge, unexpected pop-up campaign exposing Israeli crimes.

2. Most Jews believe Bobby’s I Love Israel act because he is such an honest truthteller.  But for those Jews smart enough to see through his overly exaggerated statements in support of Israel, what can they do? They can’t call him out because then they’d have to admit that Israel does indeed kill children with impunity.  So all they can do is accept RFK’s inflated words, put up with the anti-Zionist truth campaign he unleashed (inadvertently or otherwise), and milk his support of Israel for all it’s worth.

3. RFK’s biggest win is that by cozying up to Israel (no matter how suspiciously over-the-top his statements are), it keeps the Mossad dogs at bay. RFK’s platform is so far-reaching, if he didn’t make pro-Zionist noises, he’d probably be a dead man walking.

The one downfall is that Bobby’s brand as a straight-up truth-teller takes a hit. If he truly does support Israel (really ?!?!) or he simply wants to live, either way, many voters will be forced to hold their nose, if not all orifices, and vote for him because he’s the best candidate there is — above and beyond Trump and certainly every single Democrat in existence.

If he’s lying and people see through it because they know his statements in support of Israel are sophisticated optics, well, we’ll give him break.  Better to use his brand as a truthteller to spin safeguarding alliances and have a shot at the presidency than to be in harms way by those who have shown an affinity for putting the men in his family in their crosshairs.

So that’s my two cents.  I’m quite impressed Kevin came up with this angle to be wary of accepting Bobby’s statements about Israel at face value. I know I did until I read Kevin’s article. And I really, really want to believe Kevin’s hypothesis because the alternative is just be too depressing and overwhelming to accept.

In any event, those dodo Democrats better start priming a realistic winning ticket because the Kennedy juggernaut is going to clean their clock if they keep biding their time with Biden. I still say if they’re smart, they’d run super-popular Michelle Obama. She would make a great Figurehead in Chief alongside slimy-lizard Gruesome Newsom as her Dick Cheney. 

I’ll end my post with this tidbit. A string of Democratic presidential candidates from Carter to Clinton to Obama have been summoned by the Bilderbergers over the years during the voting season and each has gone on to win the (s)election.  So, guess who was at Bilderberg this year?  I’m like WTF?!  What is she doing there?! 

Stacy Abrams!  If history repeats itself, better it do so with a Democrat dupe than the Kennedy curse.

Stacey Abrams telegraphs who her handlers are